|
|
Upper Approximation Reduction in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Object Information Systems with Dominance Relations |
WU Lei1,2, YANG Shan-Lin1, GUO Qing1,2 |
1.Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-Making, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009 2.School of Mathematics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009 |
|
|
Abstract The traditional rough set theory can not be directly used to reduce the attributes of intuitionistic fuzzy object information systems(IFOIS) in which the decision attribute values are intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. In this paper, the dominance relation is introduced to intuitionistic fuzzy object information systems. Based on dominance relation, a new definition of the upper approximation decision consistent set of the condition attribute sets is presented and the judgment theorem of the upper approximation reduction is also given. Thus, the upper approximation reduction model of the condition attribute sets is established. Moreover, an algorithm to compute the upper approximation reduction is put forward. In some object information systems in which decision attribute values are intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, more concise decision rules can be obtained via the upper approximation reduction of the condition attribute sets. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
|
Received: 06 June 2013
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Pawlak Z. Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 1982, 11(5): 341-356 [2] Jackson A G, Pawlak Z, LeClair S R. Rough Sets Applied to the Discovery of Materials Knowledge. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 1998, 279(1): 14-21 [3] Slowinski R, Zopounidis C, Dimitras A I. Prediction of Company Acquisition in Greece by Means of the Rough Set Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 100(1): 1-15 [4] Chen J K, Li J J. An Application of Rough Sets to Graph Theory. Information Sciences, 2012, 201: 114-127 [5] Estaji A A, Hooshmandasl M R, Davva B. Rough Set Theory Applied to Lattice Theory. Information Sciences, 2012, 200: 108-122 [6] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96 [7] Atanassov K T, Gargov G. Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 31(3): 417-431 [8] Huang B, Wei D K, Li H X, et al. Using a Rough Set Model to Extract Rules in Dominance-Based Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Systems. Information Sciences, 2013, 221: 215-229 [9] Lu Y L, Lei Y J, Hua J X. Attribute Reduction Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Set. Control and Decision, 2009, 24(3): 336-341 (in Chinese) (路艳丽,雷英杰,华继学.基于直觉模糊粗糙集的属性约简.控制与决策, 2009, 24(3): 336-341) [10] Zhang Z M, Bai Y C, Tian J F. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Sets Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Coverings. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(9): 1369-1373 (in Chinese) (张植明,白云超,田景峰.基于覆盖的直觉模糊粗糙集.控制与决策, 2010, 25(9): 1369-1373) [11] Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough Sets Theory for Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1): 1-47 [12] Blaszczynski J, Greco S, Slowinski R. Multi-criteria Classification-A New Scheme for Application of Dominance-Based Decision Rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 181(3): 1030-1044 [13] Yang X B, Yang J Y, Wu C, et al. Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach and Knowledge Reductions in Incomplete Ordered Information Systems. Information Sciences, 2008, 178(4): 1219-1234 [14] Qian Y H, Dang C Y, Liang J Y, et al. Set-Valued Ordered Information Systems. Information Sciences, 2009, 179(16): 2809-2832 [15] Hong D H, Choi C H. Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-Making Pro-blems Based on Vague Set Theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 103-113 [16] Lakshmana V, Nayagam G, Sivaraman G. Ranking of Interval-Va-lued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11(4): 3368-3372 [17] Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. A New Approach to Ranking Alternatives Expressed via Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets // Proc of the 8th International FLINS Conference on Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control. Madrid, Spain, 2008: 265-270 |
|
|
|